Frontiers in Public Health (Sep 2022)

Concurrent validity of the combined HRV/ACC sensor and physical activity diary when monitoring physical activity in university students during free-living days

  • Haochong Liu,
  • Qian Li,
  • Yiting Li,
  • Yubo Wang,
  • Yaling Huang,
  • Dapeng Bao,
  • Haoyang Liu,
  • Haoyang Liu,
  • Yixiong Cui

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.950074
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

The purpose of this research was to determine if the scientific research device combined heart rate variability combined with an acceleration sensor (Firstbeat Bodyguard 2, BG2) was valid and reliable for time spent in different intensity zones in free-living. A total of 55 healthy participants performed 48-h physical activity (PA) monitoring with BG2, ActiGraph GT3X+ (GT3X+), and completed Bouchard Physical Activity Diary (Bouchard) every night. In the available studies, GT3X+ is considered the gold standard scientific research device for PA monitor. We compared BG2 and Bouchard with GT3X+ by difference, correlation, and agreement of PA and energy expenditure (EE) in free-living. The results showed that BG2 estimated PA more accurately than Bouchard, with a modest correlation (r > 0.49), strong agreement (τ > 0.29), and they had the lowest limits of agreement when estimating moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The EE estimated by Bouchard was the highest among the three methods, and the correlation and agreement between the three methods were high. Our findings showed that the BG2 is valid and reliable for estimating time spent in different intensity zones in free-living, especially in MVPA.

Keywords