Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (Jun 2004)
Estimates of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Australia, 2000
Abstract
Abstract Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Australia and attributable proportions associated with specific demographic groups at higher risk of infection. Methods: Two methods were used to estimate prevalence of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg): (1) Population‐based: results of a national serosurvey using sera collected opportunistically from laboratories across Australia were used for 1–59 year olds, with the HBsAg prevalence for 50–59 years extrapolated to the population aged 60 years and over; (2) Risk group‐based: estimates for selected high‐risk groups (injecting drug users, homosexual men, Indigenous Australians and people born in high‐prevalence countries), using source data from antenatal HBV screening in central Sydney, HBV prevalence studies, and estimates for low‐risk groups (first‐time blood donors) were combined proportionally to their representation in the population. Results: Prevalence of HBsAg in the national serosurvey increased, with age, from 0.0% for 1–4 and 5–9 year olds to 1.3–1.8% for the 40–49 year age group. Australian population HBsAg prevalence based on minimum and adjusted estimates from this serosurvey were 91,500 (0.49%) and 163,000 (0.87%) infections, respectively. The risk group method estimated an Australian HBsAg prevalence of 88,000 infections (0.47%). Approximately 50% of people with chronic HBV infection were estimated to be immigrants from either South‐East Asia (33.3%) or North‐East Asia (16.2%). Conclusion: The range of estimates for chronic HBV infection in Australia is broad, reflecting the uncertainty in source data. A national blood survey encompassing a large and representative population sample may help to provide more accurate estimates. A large proportion of people with chronic HBV infection are Asian born.