Patient and healthcare professionals’ perception of weekly prophylactic catheter washout in adults living with long-term catheters: qualitative study of the CATHETER II trial
John Norrie,
Graeme Maclennan,
David Cooper,
Paul Little,
Peter Murchie,
Phyo Kyaw Myint,
Mohamed Abdel-fattah,
Mary Kilonzo,
Muhammad Imran Omar,
Diana Johnson,
Sara J Maclennan,
James Ndow,
Graham Scotland,
Amanda Young,
Seonaidh Cotton,
Nikesh Thiruchelvam,
Catherine Paterson,
Lynda Constable,
Hashim Hashim,
Sheela Tripathee,
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos,
Suzanne Evans,
Karen Powell,
James Hugh Larcombe
Affiliations
John Norrie
Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit (ECTU), Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
Graeme Maclennan
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Sciences Building Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
David Cooper
Health Services Research Unit, Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Paul Little
University of Southampton, Medical School, Southampton, UK
Peter Murchie
Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Phyo Kyaw Myint
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
Mohamed Abdel-fattah
Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, Institute for Applied Health Sciences, 2nd Floor, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Mary Kilonzo
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Muhammad Imran Omar
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Diana Johnson
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
Sara J Maclennan
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
James Ndow
Department of Surgery, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Graham Scotland
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Amanda Young
Queen’s Nursing Institute, London, UK
Seonaidh Cotton
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
Nikesh Thiruchelvam
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
Catherine Paterson
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Lynda Constable
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
Hashim Hashim
Bristol Urology Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK
Sheela Tripathee
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
Suzanne Evans
Bladder Health UK, Birmingham, UK
Karen Powell
Bladder Health UK, Birmingham, UK
James Hugh Larcombe
NHS Durham Dales Easington and Sedgefield CCG, Sedgefield, County Durham, UK
Objectives To explore trial participants’ experience of long-term catheters (LTC), the acceptability of washout policies, their experience of the CATHETER II trial (a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters) and their satisfaction with the outcomes. The objectives of the healthcare professionals (HCPs) focus group and interview were to explore their attitudes towards weekly prophylactic catheter washout, views on the provision of training and participants’ ability to enact washout behaviours.Methodology A longitudinal qualitative study embedded within the CATHETER II randomised controlled trial, which included semi-structured interviews and focus groups with participants from multiple trial sites. Data were analysed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and Theoretical Domains Framework. This UK community-based study included 50 (24 female, 26 male) CATHETER II trial participants, aged between 23 and 100 years, with LTC and able to self-manage the washout and study documentation either independently or with the help of a carer. Seven HCPs (five female, two male) also participated.Results The participants had positive attitudes towards weekly prophylactic saline or acidic catheter washouts and other trial elements, such as washout training, catheter calendar and monthly phone calls. Participants and HCPs found the ‘ask’ of the CATHETER II trial and the weekly self-administered prophylactic washout policies to be feasible. The participants reported that the catheter washout training provided during the trial enhanced their self-efficacy, skills and self-reported capability to carry out the washouts. Participants reported having positive outcomes from the weekly washout. These included reduced blockage, pain or infection, reduced need for HCP support and greater psychological reassurance. HCPs attested to the participants’ understanding of and adherence to the weekly washouts and other elements of the trial.Conclusions This study shows acceptability, feasibility and self-reported fidelity of the CATHETER II trial on a behavioural level. Self-management for prophylactic catheter washouts is both feasible and, following training, achievable without any need for additional support.Trial registration number ISRCTN17116445.