Frontiers in Oncology (Sep 2015)

Urethrogram-directed Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Contraindications to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Ima ePaydar,
  • Brian Sangwook Kim,
  • Robyn A Cyr,
  • Harriss eRashid,
  • Amna eAnjum,
  • Thomas M Yung,
  • Siyuan eLei,
  • Brian Timothy Collins,
  • Simeng eSuy,
  • Anatoly eDritschilo,
  • John eLynch,
  • Sean P. Collins

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00194
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for prostate cancer. For patients with contraindications to MRI, CT-urethrogram is an alternative imaging approach to identify the location of the prostatic apex to guide treatment. This study sought to evaluate the safety of urethrogram-directed SBRT for prostate cancer.Methods: Between February 2009 and January 2014, 31 men with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated definitively with urethrogram-directed SBRT with or without supplemental intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at Georgetown University Hospital. SBRT was delivered either as a primary treatment of 35-36.25 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions or as a boost of 19.5 Gy in 3 fractions followed by supplemental conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (45-50.4 Gy). Toxicities were recorded and scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v.4.0).Results: The median patient age was 70 years with a median prostate volume of 38 cc. The median follow-up was 3.7 years. The patients were elderly (Median age = 70), and comorbidities were common (Carlson Comorbidity Index > 2 in 36%). 71% of patients utilized alpha agonists prior to treatment, and 9.7% had prior procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The 3-year actuarial incidence rates of > Grade 3 GU toxicity and > Grade 2 GI toxicity were 3.2% and 9.7%, respectively. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities.Conclusions: MRI is the preferred imaging modality to guide prostate SBRT treatment. However, urethrogram-directed SBRT is a safe alternative for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer who are unable to undergo MRI.

Keywords