Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery (Jun 2014)

A contrast study on the curative effect between trepanation and drainage and decompressive craniotomy for treating cerebellar hemorrhage

  • Jie ZHUO,
  • Chun-sheng LIU,
  • Yu-shan YANG,
  • Jian-min KANG,
  • Hua YAN

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 6
pp. 535 – 539

Abstract

Read online

Thirty-three cases of hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage were involved in this survey, with the bleeding volume over 10 ml. All of them were given external ventricular drainage and then taken continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) after admission. Within 7-24 h after the onset, they all underwent trepanation and drainage under local anesthesia. In the same period, another 33 cases of cerebellar hemorrhage patients were collected as the control, who met the inclusion criteria and were treated with conventional posterior fossa decompressive craniotomy. As results, the total efficiency of the drilling group was 81.82% (27/33), which was much better than the control group (63.64%, 21/33). However, there was no statistical significance between 2 groups (χ2 = 2.750, P = 0.097). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2014.06.014

Keywords