Scientific Reports (Aug 2021)

Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting

  • Shijia Zhao,
  • Wei Wu,
  • Saurabhi Samant,
  • Behram Khan,
  • Ghassan S. Kassab,
  • Yusuke Watanabe,
  • Yoshinobu Murasato,
  • Mohammadali Sharzehee,
  • Janaki Makadia,
  • Daniel Zolty,
  • Anastasios Panagopoulos,
  • Francesco Burzotta,
  • Francesco Migliavacca,
  • Thomas W. Johnson,
  • Thierry Lefevre,
  • Jens Flensted Lassen,
  • Emmanouil S. Brilakis,
  • Deepak L. Bhatt,
  • George Dangas,
  • Claudio Chiastra,
  • Goran Stankovic,
  • Yves Louvard,
  • Yiannis S. Chatzizisis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95026-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Patient-specific and lesion-specific computational simulation of bifurcation stenting is an attractive approach to achieve individualized pre-procedural planning that could improve outcomes. The objectives of this work were to describe and validate a novel platform for fully computational patient-specific coronary bifurcation stenting. Our computational stent simulation platform was trained using n = 4 patient-specific bench bifurcation models (n = 17 simulations), and n = 5 clinical bifurcation cases (training group, n = 23 simulations). The platform was blindly tested in n = 5 clinical bifurcation cases (testing group, n = 29 simulations). A variety of stent platforms and stent techniques with 1- or 2-stents was used. Post-stenting imaging with micro-computed tomography (μCT) for bench group and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for clinical groups were used as reference for the training and testing of computational coronary bifurcation stenting. There was a very high agreement for mean lumen diameter (MLD) between stent simulations and post-stenting μCT in bench cases yielding an overall bias of 0.03 (− 0.28 to 0.34) mm. Similarly, there was a high agreement for MLD between stent simulation and OCT in clinical training group [bias 0.08 (− 0.24 to 0.41) mm], and clinical testing group [bias 0.08 (− 0.29 to 0.46) mm]. Quantitatively and qualitatively stent size and shape in computational stenting was in high agreement with clinical cases, yielding an overall bias of < 0.15 mm. Patient-specific computational stenting of coronary bifurcations is a feasible and accurate approach. Future clinical studies are warranted to investigate the ability of computational stenting simulations to guide decision-making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and improve clinical outcomes.