Записки з українського мовознавства (Oct 2019)
NON-PARCELED COMMUNICATES AS MARKERS OF THE ADDRESSEE’S INTENTIONS: DIALOGIC DISCOURSE
Abstract
Dialogic discourse is a way of interaction between intentions of both the addresser and the addressee. The communicative event created because of this interaction forms the addresser-addressee continuum, a dialogical unity i.e. a text that is complete in terms of content and structure. It is mainly a question-answer model, where each subject of communication presents themselves as a unique, independent, and self-sufficient language personality. At the same time, the course of the dialogic discourse is emphasized by certain language means capable of verbalizing the communicants’ intentions in the dialogical discourse. It is dialogical discourse as a bilateral human interaction that is the subject of our research. The purpose of the article is to analyze non-parceled communicates as syntactic units relevant for the addressee’s intentions verbalization, to characterize their intentional range and the possibilities of using them in the dialogical discourse. In the process of communication, the communicants express their emotions, feelings, and evaluations using various syntactic constructions, however, non-parceled communicates play an important role in dialogic speech. They do not correspond to a certain speech pattern, are not subject to parceling, yet serve as an adequate means for the realization of the author’s intentions. The communicative-intentional content of non-parceled communicates manifests itself in dialogic discourse and depends on the means of their expression, and these are mainly particles, interjections or modal words that implement the categories of affirmation, negation, interrogation, incentive, emotion, evaluation. Non-parceled communicates as sentence equivalents can convey various communicative intentions: intentions of narration, interrogation, incentive, intentions of assertion and negation, emotiveness and evaluation. However, according to our observations based on various methods of linguistic research (descriptive, structural, contextual-interpretative, methods of transformational analysis), they verbalize primarily the addressee’s intentions and serve as a remark-reaction to the intention of the main subject of communication - the speaker. Non-parceled communicates are the relevant syntactic markers of the t intentions of the addressee whose position can be explicated as a remark-reaction in the dialogue. Undoubtedly, they verbalize the intentions of the addressee - the main subject of communication. However, in the dialogical discourse, which reflects the communicative interaction of two participants in the process of communication, distinctly represented by the question -answer complex of stimulus and reaction remarks, non-parceled communicates most often verbalize the intentions of the addressee, expressing agreement or disagreement, objection (affirmative and negative communicates), emphasizing the qualifying intention of request, an incentive to continue the conversation (interrogative and incentive communicates), vividly verbalizing the world of human emotions and evaluations (emotional and evaluative communicates), expressing respect for human interaction politeness (etiquette communicates). The specified communicative-intentional scope of non-parceled communicates ensures their proper place in the system of syntactic units that adequately convey the atmosphere and tonality of dialogic discourse, its immediacy, dynamism and naturalness. Defining the role of non-verbal communicative means that accompany non-parceled communicates forms the prospect of further research.
Keywords
