Frontiers in Oncology (Sep 2022)

Real-world experience with anti–programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective single-center study

  • Xinpeng Wang,
  • Xinpeng Wang,
  • Lvjuan Cai,
  • Lvjuan Cai,
  • Mengjing Wu,
  • Mengjing Wu,
  • Guo Li,
  • Guo Li,
  • Yunyun Zhu,
  • Yunyun Zhu,
  • Xinyue Lin,
  • Xinyue Lin,
  • Xue Yan,
  • Xue Yan,
  • Peng Mo,
  • Peng Mo,
  • Huachun Luo,
  • Huachun Luo,
  • Zhichao Fu,
  • Zhichao Fu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.880053
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

The “real-world” data of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in esophageal cancer (EPC) are still an unmet medical need, including the clinical efficacy and safety. Seventy-seven EPC data were studied retrospectively; the progression-free survival (PFS), risk factors (clinical stages larger than stage II, metastatic sites larger than 2, treatment lines larger than the first line, previous surgical treatment, combined positive score [CPS] expression, etc.), and the safety were analyzed. The median PFS for all patients was 7.2 months, clinical stage > stage II; the number of treatment lines > first line was significantly correlated with prognosis (all P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that the median PFS of patients with clinical stage ≤ II was better; the results were the same for the patients with ≤2 metastatic sites, first-line PD-1 inhibitors, and not previously received radical surgery (all P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of varying degrees was 25.97% (20/77) in 20 patients and 6.49% (5/77) of grade 3/4 AEs. The highest AE was myelosuppression (15.58%), followed by liver function injury (7.79%). In addition, ≥2 lines of treatment and >2 metastatic sites predicted poor outcomes for patients with EPC who had failed first-line therapy or progressed with the combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment strategy (all P < 0.05).

Keywords