Long-term outcomes of cryoballoon versus robotic magnetic navigation guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation performed with cryoballoon (CRYO) in comparison with robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). A total of 200 patients with symptomatic PersAF were prospectively enrolled and non-randomly assigned (1:1) to the CRYO or RMN guided-ablation group undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and additional linear ablation if necessary and then followed up over 5 years. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) recurrence following a 3-month blanking period after the initial procedure. The secondary endpoints consisted of all-cause and cardiovascular rehospitalizations, rates of electrical cardioversion (EC) and re-do ablation, new-onset neurological event, major bleeding event and the difference in CHA2DS2-VASc score at 5-year compared with baseline. After a median follow-up period of 60 months, 184 patients (93 in RMN, 91 in CRYO) completed the follow-up. Freedom from recurrent ATs was achieved in 44 out of 93 patients in the RMN group and 37 out of 91 patients in the CRYO group (47.3% vs. 40.7%, P = 0.32). There were no significant differences in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular rehospitalizations, rates of EC and re-do ablation, new-onset neurological event, and major bleeding event at 5 years. Anticoagulation (OAC) discontinuation was relatively common after ablation, since 48.4% of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 were not on OAC therapy. CRYO is comparable to RMN-guided ablation with respect to long-term freedom from ATs in patients with PersAF. Discontinuation of OAC after ablation is not rare even in patients at risk of stroke for continued OAC therapy.

Keywords

• Atrial fibrillation
• Catheter ablation
• Cryoballoon
• Long-term
• Robotic magnetic navigation