PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study.

  • Albertine M B van der Does,
  • Eva L Kneepkens,
  • Elien B Uitvlugt,
  • Sanne L Jansen,
  • Louise Schilder,
  • George Tokmaji,
  • Sofieke C Wijers,
  • Marijn Radersma,
  • J Nina M Heijnen,
  • Paul F A Teunissen,
  • Pim B J E Hulshof,
  • Geke M Overvliet,
  • Carl E H Siegert,
  • Fatma Karapinar-Çarkit

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229940
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 4
p. e0229940

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesTo identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients' perspectives.DesignA prospective cross-sectional single-center study.SettingUrban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Participants430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days.MethodsResidents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOf 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23-4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source.Conclusion and implications13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient's perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements.