ERJ Open Research (Oct 2020)

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in coronavirus disease 2019: a case series

  • Joe Zhang,
  • Blair Merrick,
  • Genex L. Correa,
  • Luigi Camporota,
  • Andrew Retter,
  • Andrew Doyle,
  • Guy W. Glover,
  • Peter B. Sherren,
  • Stephen J. Tricklebank,
  • Sangita Agarwal,
  • Boris E. Lams,
  • Nicholas A. Barrett,
  • Nicholas Ioannou,
  • Jonathan Edgeworth,
  • Christopher I.S. Meadows

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00463-2020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Background The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in severe hypoxaemic respiratory failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been described, but reported utilisation and outcomes are variable, and detailed information on patient characteristics is lacking. We aim to report clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of COVID-19 patients requiring VV-ECMO, admitted over 2 months to a high-volume centre in the UK. Methods Patient information, including baseline characteristics and clinical parameters, was collected retrospectively from electronic health records for COVID-19 VV-ECMO admissions between 3 March and 2 May 2020. Clinical management is described. Data are reported for survivors and nonsurvivors. Results We describe 43 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who received VV-ECMO. Median age was 46 years (interquartile range 35.5–52.5) and 76.7% were male. Median time from symptom onset to VV-ECMO was 14 days (interquartile range 11–17.5). All patients underwent computed tomography imaging, revealing extensive pulmonary consolidation in 95.3%, and pulmonary embolus in 27.9%. Overall, 79.1% received immunomodulation with methylprednisolone for persistent maladaptive hyperinflammatory state. Vasopressors were used in 86%, and 44.2% received renal replacement therapy. Median duration on VV-ECMO was 13 days (interquartile range 8–20). 14 patients died (32.6%) and 29 survived (67.4%) to hospital discharge. Nonsurvivors had significantly higher d-dimer (38.2 versus 9.5 mg·L−1, fibrinogen equivalent units; p=0.035) and creatinine (169 versus 73 μmol·L−1; p=0.022) at commencement of VV-ECMO. Conclusions Our data support the use of VV-ECMO in selected COVID-19 patients. The cohort was characterised by high degree of alveolar consolidation, systemic inflammation and intravascular thrombosis.