Research in Cardiovascular Medicine (Apr 2024)

Could the Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Be Correlated with Cellular Rejection in Asymptomatic Heart Transplant Recipients? A Brief Report

  • Kambiz Mozaffari,
  • Nozar Givtaj,
  • Mahshid Hesami,
  • Marzieh Mirtajaddini,
  • Mahsa Fareghbal,
  • Leila Nojoomizadeh,
  • Nasim Naderi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_58_23
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 6 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is mainly associated with acute or chronic graft rejection in various solid organs. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the plasma viral load of CMV infection in postheart transplant patients and its correlation with the grading of cellular graft rejection in endomyocardial biopsies. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 90 samples from 65 asymptomatic heart transplant recipients scheduled for routine endomyocardial biopsy were obtained. All the recipients had a history of positive serology for CMV infection before transplantation. Evaluation of their DNA was tracked using the polymerase chain reaction technique and the use of specific virus DNA primers, and based on this, the peak virus load (the number of virus copies per milliliter) was determined. A peak viral load >10,000 copies/mL was considered positive. Graft rejection grading was determined based on the ISHLT grading system. Results: The mean (standard deviation) age of the patients (37 men) was 67 (37.3) years. The graft rejection grading was as follows: 22.2% grade 0, 38.9% Quilty effect (QE), 35.6% grade 1, and 3.3% grade 2. The mean plasma viral load level of CMV infection was 2197.4 (1256.2) μg/μL, 1970.4 (1150.3) μg/μL, and 4567.2 (1669.1) μg/μL in grades 0, QE, and 1 and/or 2, respectively (P < 0.001). The virus load was significantly higher in those with higher grades of cellular rejection. Conclusion: The relationship between the plasma level of CMV viral load and the grading of cellular graft rejection in heart transplant patients could emphasize the role of CMV virus in the pathophysiology of graft rejection. A closer surveillance for CMV infection using the viral load is also recommended in particular in those who have higher grades of graft rejection.

Keywords