Reproductive Medicine and Biology (Oct 2021)

Consistency between chromosomal status analysis of biopsied human blastocyst trophectoderm cells and whole blastocyst cells

  • Harunori Takahashi,
  • Kazumasa Takahashi,
  • Mayumi Goto,
  • Takeo Hirakawa,
  • Hisataka Hasegawa,
  • Akihiro Shitara,
  • Takuya Iwasawa,
  • Kazue Togashi,
  • Kenichi Makino,
  • Hiromitsu Shirasawa,
  • Hiroshi Miura,
  • Wataru Sato,
  • Yukiyo Kumazawa,
  • Yukihiro Terada

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12400
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 4
pp. 444 – 450

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose This study investigated the consistency between results of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy performed on trophectoderm (TE) cells and remaining blastocyst cells. Methods TE biopsy was performed on 29 surplus cryopreserved human blastocysts. Biopsy samples and remaining blastocysts were processed using the VeriSeq PGS kit, and chromosomal statuses were compared by next‐generation sequencing. Results Discordance was observed in the chromosomal status of 11 out of 29 blastocysts between the biopsied TE and remaining blastocysts. Concordance was observed in 11 of 12 blastocysts classified as euploid by TE biopsy and in 7 of 17 blastocysts classified as aneuploid. There was 100% concordance (7/7) in cases diagnosed as aneuploid with no mosaicism by TE biopsy. However, discordance was observed in all 10 cases showing mosaicism or partial chromosomal abnormality. Conclusion Chromosomal status analysis based on TE biopsy does not accurately reflect the chromosomal status of the whole blastocyst. The chromosomal status is usually the same between the TE and remaining blastocyst cells in cases diagnosed as euploid or aneuploid with no mosaicism. However, mosaic blastocysts and those with other types of structural rearrangements have a higher risk of inconsistency, warranting caution during embryo selection.

Keywords