Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research (Jul 2012)

Criopreservación de espermatozoides del lenguado Paralichthys adspersus Cryopreservation of flounder Paralichthys adspersus spermatozoa

  • Christian Catcoparco,
  • Alfonso Silva,
  • Enrique Dupré

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 40, no. 2
pp. 259 – 266

Abstract

Read online

Para optimizar las técnicas de reproducción en cautiverio de lenguado Paralichthys adspersus; se elaboró una metodología para la criopreservación de sus espermatozoides. Para ello, se evaluó el efecto del dimetil sulfóxido (DMSO) como agente crioprotector en tres concentraciones diferentes (1,0; 1,5 y 2,0 M) sobre la motilidad espermática y su posterior congelación con cinco diferentes tasas: -7,5; -10; -12,5; -20 y -30°C min-1, utilizando un congelador automático programable. Los mayores porcentajes de motilidad espermática post congelamiento-descongelamiento (40,5 ± 13%) fueron obtenidos al utilizar una tasa de -10°C min-1 y DMSO sin encontrar diferencias significativas entre las tres diferentes concentraciones de DMSO (P To optimize the techniques of captive breeding of flounder Paralichthys adspersus, a methodology was developed for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa of this species. The effect on sperm motility post-thawing, using three different concentrations (1.0; 1.5 and 2.0 M) of DMSO as cryoprotective agent and five different freezing rates -7.5; -10; -12.5; -20 and -30°C min-1, with an automatic programmable freezer was evaluated. The highest percentages of post-thawing sperm motility were obtained by freezing sperm at -10°C min-1, no significant differences (P < 0.05) were founded between the three different concentrations of DMSO used. Subsequently, we evaluated the effect of a non-permeable cryo-additive (chicken egg yolk, VHG), in order to obtain an increasing of the percentage of sperm motility. We used a cryoprotectant solution including DMSO at three different concentrations adding 10% VHG v/v. The highest percentages of sperm motility (71.71 ± 13%) were obtained at the freezing rate of -10°C min-1 without significant differences between the three concentrations of the cryoprotectant solution in which the sample was incubated sperm (P < 0.05). A high significant difference between the sperm motility percentages post-thawing using DMSO and DMSO with VHG, was observed.

Keywords