Complex & Intelligent Systems (Jun 2024)

Prioritizing complex health levels beyond autism triage using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making

  • A. S. Albahri,
  • Rula A. Hamid,
  • Laith Alzubaidi,
  • Raad Z. Homod,
  • Khamis A. Zidan,
  • Hassan Mubark,
  • Ghadeer Ghazi Shayea,
  • O. S. Albahri,
  • A. H. Alamoodi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01432-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 5
pp. 6159 – 6188

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This study delves into the complex prioritization process for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), focusing on triaged patients at three urgency levels. Establishing a dynamic prioritization solution is challenging for resolving conflicts or trade-offs among ASD criteria. This research employs fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) theory across four methodological phases. In the first phase, the study identifies a triaged ASD dataset, considering 19 critical medical and sociodemographic criteria for the three ASD levels. The second phase introduces a new Decision Matrix (DM) designed to manage the prioritization process effectively. The third phase focuses on the new extension of Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (FWZIC) to construct the criteria weights using Single-Valued Neutrosophic 2-tuple Linguistic (SVN2TL). The fourth phase formulates the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method to rank patients within each urgency level. Results from the SVN2TL-FWZIC weights offer significant insights, including the higher criteria values "C12 = Laughing for no reason" and "C16 = Notice the sound of the bell" with 0.097358 and 0.083832, indicating their significance in identifying potential ASD symptoms. The SVN2TL-FWZIC weights offer the base for prioritizing the three triage levels using MABAC, encompassing medical and behavioral dimensions. The methodology undergoes rigorous evaluation through sensitivity analysis scenarios, confirming the consistency of the prioritization results with critical analysis points. The methodology compares with three benchmark studies, using four distinct points, and achieves a remarkable 100% congruence with these prior investigations. The implications of this study are far-reaching, offering a valuable guide for clinical psychologists in prioritizing complex cases of ASD patients.

Keywords