The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research (Mar 2024)

ERBB2‐amplified lobular breast carcinoma exhibits concomitant CDK12 co‐amplification associated with poor prognostic features

  • Miriam Forster‐Sack,
  • Martin Zoche,
  • Bernhard Pestalozzi,
  • Isabell Witzel,
  • Esther Irene Schwarz,
  • Joel Julien Herzig,
  • Hisham Fansa,
  • Christoph Tausch,
  • Jeff Ross,
  • Holger Moch,
  • Zsuzsanna Varga

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.12362
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Most invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILBCs) are luminal‐type carcinomas with an HER2‐negative phenotype (ERBB2 or HER2 un‐amplified) and CDH1 mutations. Rare variants include ERBB2‐amplified subtypes associated with an unfavorable prognosis and less response to anti‐HER2 targeted therapies. We analyzed the clinicopathological and molecular features of ERBB2‐amplified ILBC and compared these characteristics with ERBB2‐unamplified ILBC. A total of 253 patients with ILBC were analyzed. Paraffin‐embedded formalin‐fixed tumor samples from 250 of these patients were added to a tissue microarray. Protein expression of prognostic, stem cell and breast‐specific markers was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Hybrid capture‐based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed for 10 ILBCs that were either fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or IHC positive for HER2 amplification/overexpression and 10 ILBCs that were either FISH or IHC negative. Results were compared with a CGP database of 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas. The CGP definition of ERBB2 amplification was five copies or greater. A total of 17 of 255 ILBC (5%) were ERBB2 amplified. ERBB2‐amplified ILBC had higher tumor stage (p < 0.0001), more frequent positive nodal status (p = 0.00022), more distant metastases (p = 0.012), and higher histological grade (p < 0.0001), and were more often hormone receptor negative (p < 0.001) and more often SOX10 positive (p = 0.005). ERBB2 short variant sequence mutations were more often detected in ERBB2‐unamplified tumors (6/10, p = 0.027), whereas CDH1 mutations/copy loss were frequently present in both subgroups (9/10 and 7/10, respectively). Amplification of pathogenic genes were more common in HER2‐positive ILBC (p = 0.0009). CDK12 gene amplification (≥6 copies) was detected in 7 of 10 ERBB2‐amplified ILBC (p = 0.018). There were no CDK12 gene amplifications reported in 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas in the FMI Insights CGP database. ERBB2‐amplified ILBC is a distinct molecular subgroup with frequent coamplification of CDK12, whereas ERBB2 sequence mutations occur only in ERBB2‐unamplified ILBC. CDK12/ERBB2 co‐amplification may explain the poor prognosis and therapy resistance of ERBB2‐amplified ILBC.

Keywords