PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Relationship of self-reported body size and shape with risk for prostate cancer: A UK case-control study.

  • Mohammad Aladwani,
  • Artitaya Lophatananon,
  • Fredie Robinson,
  • Aneela Rahman,
  • William Ollier,
  • Zsofia Kote-Jarai,
  • David Dearnaley,
  • Govindasami Koveela,
  • Nafisa Hussain,
  • Reshma Rageevakumar,
  • Diana Keating,
  • Andrea Osborne,
  • Tokhir Dadaev,
  • Mark Brook,
  • British Association of Urological Surgeons’ Section of Oncology,
  • Rosalind Eeles,
  • Rosalind Eeles,
  • Kenneth R Muir

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238928
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 9
p. e0238928

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionPrevious evidence has suggested a relationship between male self-reported body size and the risk of developing prostate cancer. In this UK-wide case-control study, we have explored the possible association of prostate cancer risk with male self-reported body size. We also investigated body shape as a surrogate marker for fat deposition around the body. As obesity and excessive adiposity have been linked with increased risk for developing a number of different cancers, further investigation of self-reported body size and shape and their potential relationship with prostate cancer was considered to be appropriate.ObjectiveThe study objective was to investigate whether underlying associations exist between prostate cancer risk and male self-reported body size and shape.MethodsData were collected from a large case-control study of men (1928 cases and 2043 controls) using self-administered questionnaires. Data from self-reported pictograms of perceived body size relating to three decades of life (20's, 30's and 40's) were recorded and analysed, including the pattern of change. The associations of self-identified body shape with prostate cancer risk were also explored.ResultsSelf-reported body size for men in their 20's, 30's and 40's did not appear to be associated with prostate cancer risk. More than half of the subjects reported an increase in self-reported body size throughout these three decades of life. Furthermore, no association was observed between self-reported body size changes and prostate cancer risk. Using 'symmetrical' body shape as a reference group, subjects with an 'apple' shape showed a significant 27% reduction in risk (Odds ratio = 0.73, 95% C.I. 0.57-0.92).ConclusionsChange in self-reported body size throughout early to mid-adulthood in males is not a significant risk factor for the development of prostate cancer. Body shape indicative of body fat distribution suggested that an 'apple' body shape was protective and inversely associated with prostate cancer risk when compared with 'symmetrical' shape. Further studies which investigate prostate cancer risk and possible relationships with genetic factors known to influence body shape may shed further light on any underlying associations.