Frontiers in Climate (Sep 2021)

3 Challenges, 3 Errors, and 3 Solutions to Integrate Frontline Communities in Climate Change Policy and Research: Lessons From California

  • Angel Santiago Fernandez-Bou,
  • Angel Santiago Fernandez-Bou,
  • Angel Santiago Fernandez-Bou,
  • J. Pablo Ortiz-Partida,
  • Leticia M. Classen-Rodriguez,
  • Leticia M. Classen-Rodriguez,
  • Chantelise Pells,
  • Kristin B. Dobbin,
  • Vicky Espinoza,
  • Vicky Espinoza,
  • José Manuel Rodríguez-Flores,
  • José Manuel Rodríguez-Flores,
  • José Manuel Rodríguez-Flores,
  • José Manuel Rodríguez-Flores,
  • Chia Thao,
  • Chia Thao,
  • Courtney R. Hammond Wagner,
  • Amanda Fencl,
  • Humberto Flores-Landeros,
  • Humberto Flores-Landeros,
  • Humberto Flores-Landeros,
  • Humberto Flores-Landeros,
  • Mahesh L. Maskey,
  • Mahesh L. Maskey,
  • Spencer A. Cole,
  • Spencer A. Cole,
  • Spencer A. Cole,
  • Shayda Azamian,
  • Eliseo Gamiño,
  • Alexander Guzman,
  • Alexander Guzman,
  • Ana Grace F. Alvarado,
  • Ana Grace F. Alvarado,
  • Ana Grace F. Alvarado,
  • Miriam S. Campos-Martínez,
  • Coreen Weintraub,
  • Espi Sandoval,
  • Ruth M. Dahlquist-Willard,
  • Leigh A. Bernacchi,
  • Colleen C. Naughton,
  • Colleen C. Naughton,
  • Robin M. DeLugan,
  • Josué Medellín-Azuara,
  • Josué Medellín-Azuara,
  • Josué Medellín-Azuara

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.717554
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3

Abstract

Read online

Frontline communities of California experience disproportionate social, economic, and environmental injustices, and climate change is exacerbating the root causes of inequity in those areas. Yet, climate adaptation and mitigation strategies often fail to meaningfully address the experience of frontline community stakeholders. Here, we present three challenges, three errors, and three solutions to better integrate frontline communities' needs in climate change research and to create more impactful policies. We base our perspective on our collective firsthand experiences and on scholarship to bridge local knowledge with hydroclimatic research and policymaking. Unawareness of local priorities (Challenge 1) is a consequence of Ignoring local knowledge (Error 1) that can be, in part, resolved with Information exchange and expansion of community-based participatory research (Solution 1). Unequal access to natural resources (Challenge 2) is often due to Top-down decision making (Error 2), but Buffer zones for environmental protection, green areas, air quality, and water security can help achieve environmental justice (Solution 2). Unequal access to public services (Challenge 3) is a historical issue that persists because of System abuse and tokenism (Error 3), and it may be partially resolved with Multi-benefit projects to create socioeconomic and environmental opportunities within frontline communities that include positive externalities for other stakeholders and public service improvements (Solution 3). The path forward in climate change policy decision-making must be grounded in collaboration with frontline community members and practitioners trained in working with vulnerable stakeholders. Addressing co-occurring inequities exacerbated by climate change requires transdisciplinary efforts to identify technical, policy, and engineering solutions.

Keywords