Current Oncology (Mar 2024)

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts or <i>SF3B1</i> Mutations: The Improved Clinical Utility of World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification 2022 Definitions, a Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review

  • Shamim Mortuza,
  • Benjamin Chin-Yee,
  • Tyler E. James,
  • Ian H. Chin-Yee,
  • Benjamin D. Hedley,
  • Jenny M. Ho,
  • Lalit Saini,
  • Alejandro Lazo-Langner,
  • Laila Schenkel,
  • Pratibha Bhai,
  • Bekim Sadikovic,
  • Jonathan Keow,
  • Nikhil Sangle,
  • Cyrus C. Hsia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31040134
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31, no. 4
pp. 1762 – 1773

Abstract

Read online

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with ring sideroblasts (RS) are diagnosed via bone marrow aspiration in the presence of either (i) ≥15% RS or (ii) 5–14% RS and an SF3B1 mutation. In the MEDALIST trial and in an interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial, lower-risk MDS-RS patients had decreased transfusion dependency with luspatercept treatment. A total of 6817 patients with suspected hematologic malignancies underwent molecular testing using a next-generation-sequencing-based genetic assay and 395 MDS patients, seen at our centre from 1 January 2018 to 31 May 2023, were reviewed. Of these, we identified 39 evaluable patients as having lower-risk MDS with SF3B1 mutations: there were 20 (51.3%) males and 19 (48.7%) females, with a median age of 77 years (range of 57 to 92). Nineteen (48.7%) patients had an isolated SF3B1 mutation with a mean variant allele frequency of 35.2% +/− 8.1%, ranging from 7.4% to 46.0%. There were 29 (74.4%) patients with ≥15% RS, 6 (15.4%) with 5 to 14% RS, one (2.6%) with 1% RS, and 3 (7.7%) with no RS. Our study suggests that a quarter of patients would be missed based on the morphologic criterion of only using RS greater than 15% and supports the revised 2022 definitions of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC), which shift toward molecularly defined subtypes of MDS and appropriate testing.

Keywords