The Variation Between Unilateral and Bilateral Weight Bearing in Hindfoot Alignment Evaluation. Part I: A Prospective In Vivo Radiographic Study

Abstract

Category: Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: When weight bearing radiographs are taken, the patient is frequently asked to stand on the foot being examined with the other foot lifted off the floor. We have found however that alignments of the hind and midfoot change when bearing weight switches from bilateral to unilateral standing. This study investigated the possible differences in hindfoot alignments between unilateral and bilateral weight bearing using radiographical evaluation. Methods: Eight flexible feet without symptoms symptoms, nor significant trauma & surgical history in their lower limbs were recruited for this study. A portable fluoroscopy machine (Smart C, Turner Imaging, Salt Lake City, USA) was used to take weightbearing lateral views. The patient first stood on both feet with the non-examined foot standing outside of the collimator but bearing weight evenly (Figure 1), and then lifted the non-examined foot off the floor when the lateral XR image was taken for the examined foot. Hindfoot alignment in both positions was reflected by measuring the angle between the long axes of the proximal and distal portions of the Achilles tendon on the skin using the subtalar joint line as the intersection. On lateral XRs, various parameters were measured to reflect the subtalar joint alignment, the position of the calcaneus with inversion and eversion of the hindfoot, and the lateral and medial arch heights. Results: From bearing weight on two feet (bilaterally) to one foot (unilaterally), the Hindfoot Alignment Angle (Achilles) increased (6.23 to 11.21 degrees), the Calcaneal Pitch Angle decreased (22.06 to 19.22 degrees), the Middle vs Posterior Facets Angle decreased (166.46 to 160.74 degrees), and the 5th metatarsal/cuboid height decreased (0.73 to 0.67) all significant changes (p < 0.05). All of these represented a pronation movement in the mid and hindfoot, ie, valgus tilt/eversion of the calcaneus, decreased sinus tarsi opening, and reduced lateral arch height. In this small cohort, these differences were more obvious in the feet that were either slightly flat or cavus shaped (Figure 1, Table 1, and 2) than in feet with a more neutral alignment. Conclusion: The hindfoot and midfoot are more pronated in unilateral weightbearing than in bilateral weightbearing which may mask the severity of the deformity in a flexible cavovarus foot, but increase that in a flexible flatfoot. Modification of the traditionally used unilateral weightbearing position in obtaining clinical radiographs should be considered. Bilateral WBCT scans may be a better alternative, taking advantage of allowing both feet to stand in the most natural position without one foot blocking the other during the radiographic imaging.