GIScience & Remote Sensing (Dec 2023)

Retrieval and validation of vertical LAI profile derived from airborne and spaceborne LiDAR data at a deciduous needleleaf forest site

  • Yao Wang,
  • Hongliang Fang,
  • Yinghui Zhang,
  • Sijia Li,
  • Yong Pang,
  • Tian Ma,
  • Yu Li

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2023.2214987
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 60, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Leaf area index (LAI) is defined as one half of the total green leaf area per unit ground surface area. Its vertical profile is critical for understanding the remote sensing radiative transfer processes. LAI profile has been derived from airborne and spaceborne LiDAR data, such as the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) installed on the International Space Station. However, the capability of various algorithms for the LAI profile estimation with airborne LiDAR is not clearly evaluated, and the estimated LAI profiles, including the GEDI LAI products, are not been fully validated. This study conducted a quantitative retrieval and validation of the LAI profiles using terrestrial and airborne laser scanning (TLS and ALS) and spaceborne GEDI data over a deciduous needleleaf forest site in northern China. The vertical LAI profile was estimated in the field using an upward digital hemispherical photography (DHP) attached to a portable measurement system in 2020 and 2021. A suite of new LiDAR indices combining both LiDAR return number and return intensity was explored for the LAI profile estimation. All LAI profiles obtained from the DHP, TLS, ALS, and GEDI during the leaf-on season and leaf-off season were compared. The DHP shows a good agreement with the TLS LAI profiles (R2 = 0.97). The LAI profile derived from the ALS data using the combined light penetration index (LPIRI) agrees well (R2 ≥0.86) with the DHP, TLS, and GEDI estimates. In general, the LPIRI is advantageous for regional LAI profile mapping from ALS. The GEDI cumulative LAI corresponds well with the DHP during the leaf-on season (R2 = 0.90, RMSE = 0.23), but underestimates during the leaf-off season (R2 = 0.70, RMSE = 0.14, bias=−0.13). The underestimation is attributed to the higher canopy and ground reflectance ratio (ρv/ρg) assigned in the algorithm and the height discrepancy between the GEDI and field measurements. For the GEDI LAI profile product, further validation and improvement are necessary for other biome types and landscape conditions, especially during the leaf-off season.

Keywords