Frontiers in Neurology (Feb 2024)

Combined cortical thickness and blink reflex recovery cycle to differentiate essential tremor with and without resting tremor

  • Camilla Calomino,
  • Andrea Quattrone,
  • Andrea Quattrone,
  • Maria Giovanna Bianco,
  • Rita Nisticò,
  • Jolanda Buonocore,
  • Marianna Crasà,
  • Maria Grazia Vaccaro,
  • Alessia Sarica,
  • Aldo Quattrone

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1372262
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo investigate the performance of structural MRI cortical and subcortical morphometric data combined with blink-reflex recovery cycle (BRrc) values using machine learning (ML) models in distinguishing between essential tremor (ET) with resting tremor (rET) and classic ET.MethodsWe enrolled 47 ET, 43 rET patients and 45 healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent brain 3 T-MRI and BRrc examination at different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 100–300 msec). MRI data (cortical thickness, volumes, surface area, roughness, mean curvature and subcortical volumes) were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images. We employed two decision tree-based ML classification algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and Random Forest) combining MRI data and BRrc values to differentiate between rET and ET patients.ResultsML models based exclusively on MRI features reached acceptable performance (AUC: 0.85–0.86) in differentiating rET from ET patients and from HC. Similar performances were obtained by ML models based on BRrc data (AUC: 0.81–0.82 in rET vs. ET and AUC: 0.88–0.89 in rET vs. HC). ML models combining imaging data (cortical thickness, surface, roughness, and mean curvature) together with BRrc values showed the highest classification performance in distinguishing between rET and ET patients, reaching AUC of 0.94 ± 0.05. The improvement in classification performances when BRrc data were added to imaging features was confirmed by both ML algorithms.ConclusionThis study highlights the usefulness of adding a simple electrophysiological assessment such as BRrc to MRI cortical morphometric features for accurately distinguishing rET from ET patients, paving the way for a better classification of these ET syndromes.

Keywords