International Journal of Molecular Sciences (Apr 2020)

Comparative Study of Constipation Exacerbation by Potassium Binders Using a Loperamide-Induced Constipation Model

  • Yuki Narita,
  • Koichi Fukumoto,
  • Masaki Fukunaga,
  • Yuki Kondo,
  • Yoichi Ishitsuka,
  • Hirofumi Jono,
  • Tetsumi Irie,
  • Hideyuki Saito,
  • Daisuke Kadowaki,
  • Sumio Hirata

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072491
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 7
p. 2491

Abstract

Read online

Patients on dialysis are frequently administered high doses of potassium binders such as calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), which exacerbate constipation. Here, we compare the degree of constipation induced by CPS and SPS using a loperamide-induced constipation model to identify the safer potassium binder. Constipation model was created by twice-daily intraperitoneal administration (ip) of loperamide hydrochloride (Lop; 1 mg/kg body weight) in rats for 3 days. Rats were assigned to a control group, Lop group, Lop + CPS group or Lop + SPS group, and a crossover comparative study was performed. Defecation status (number of feces, feces wet weight, fecal water content and gastrointestinal transit time (GTT)) was evaluated. In the Lop + CPS group, GTT was significantly longer, and fecal water content was reduced. In the Lop + SPS group—although the fecal water content and GTT were unaffected—the number of fecal pellets and the fecal wet weight improved. Thus, SPS was less likely to cause constipation exacerbation than CPS. Considering the high frequency of constipation in dialysis patients with hyperkalemia, preferentially administering SPS over CPS may prevent constipation exacerbation.

Keywords