PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia.

  • Rita M Traxler,
  • Tsira Napetvaridze,
  • Zviad Asanishvili,
  • Marika Geleishvili,
  • Ketevan Rukhadze,
  • Giorgi Maghlakelidze,
  • Mariam Broladze,
  • Maka Kokhreidze,
  • Edmond F Maes,
  • Debby Reynolds,
  • Mo Salman,
  • Sean V Shadomy,
  • Sangeeta Rao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224176
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 10
p. e0224176

Abstract

Read online

INTRODUCTION:Anthrax is endemic in Georgia and recent outbreaks prompted a livestock-handler case-control study with a component to evaluate anthrax knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among livestock handlers or owners. METHODS:Cases were handlers of livestock with confirmed animal anthrax from June 2013-May 2015. Handlers of four matched unaffected animals were selected as controls, two from the same village as the case animal ("village control") and two from 3-10 km away ("area control"). Descriptive statistics were reported and conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the magnitude of the association of cases with specific study KAP factors. RESULTS:Cases were more likely male, had lower level college education, less animal care experience, and provided more animal care to their cattle. Cases had lower odds of burying a suddenly dead animal compared to all controls (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.12, 0.88) and area controls (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.91). On an 8-point knowledge scale, cases having an animal with anthrax had a 1.31 times greater knowledge score compared to all controls (95% CI: 1.03, 1.67). Cases had higher odds of ever having human anthrax or knowing another person who had anthrax compared to all controls (OR: 4.56, 95% CI: 1.45, 14.30) and area controls (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 1.52, 33.80). DISCUSSION:Cases were more knowledgeable of anthrax and had better anthrax prevention practices, but these are likely a result of the case investigation and ring vaccination following the death of their animal. CONCLUSIONS:The findings reveal a low level of knowledge and practices related to anthrax control and prevention, and will guide educational material development to fill these gaps.