Journal of Pain Research (Aug 2020)

Pain Control with Splanchnic Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Unresponsive to Celiac Plexus Neurolysis

  • Comlek S

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 13
pp. 2023 – 2031

Abstract

Read online

Savas Comlek Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Besiktas 34349, TurkeyCorrespondence: Savas ComlekGayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Besiktas 34349, TurkeyTel +90 532 4273310Email [email protected]/Aims: In most instances of abdominal pain associated with pancreatic cancer, pain may become refractory to increasing doses of narcotics. Celiac plexus neurolysis represents an option; however, altered celiac plexus anatomy may render this treatment infeasible or ineffective, where splanchnic nerve neurolysis may represent another option. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of splanchnic neurolysis in pancreatic cancer patients not responsive to celiac plexus neurolysis.Patients and Methods: Among all 84 patients who underwent celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain during the study period, 34 patients did not respond and underwent splanchnic nerve neurolysis under fluoroscopic guidance and thus included in this retrospective study. Stage IV, III, and II disease was present in 38.2%, 47.1%, and 14.7% of the patients. During the study, 88.2% were receiving chemotherapy, whereas none were on radiotherapy. Data for daily narcotic dose equivalents and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores during outpatient visits at baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months were extracted.Results: Pain response rates were 76.5%, 84.4%, and 71.0%, at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months, respectively. A significant and dramatic reduction was seen in VAS scores at 2 weeks (2.8± 1.2 versus 6.3± 1.1, p< 0.001), and this significant decline was maintained for 3 months. Similarly, a significant and dramatic reduction was seen in daily narcotic need at 2 weeks (20.8± 32.9 versus 93.4± 86.2 mg, p< 0.001), which was also maintained during the 3-month follow-up. The procedure was generally well tolerated.Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that splanchnic neurolysis represents a durable and effective option for pain control in pancreatic cancer patients in whom the neurolysis of the celiac plexus is ineffective. However, these conclusions refer to only preliminary single-center results in a selected patient group; thus, further large studies are warranted.Keywords: pancreatic cancer, pain control, splanchnic neurolysis, celiac plexus neurolysis

Keywords