Communications Medicine (Oct 2024)

Disease coverage of human genome-wide association studies and pharmaceutical research and development

  • María Gordillo-Marañón,
  • Amand F. Schmidt,
  • Alasdair Warwick,
  • Chris Tomlinson,
  • Cai Ytsma,
  • Jorgen Engmann,
  • Ana Torralbo,
  • Rory Maclean,
  • Reecha Sofat,
  • Claudia Langenberg,
  • Anoop D. Shah,
  • Spiros Denaxas,
  • Munir Pirmohamed,
  • Harry Hemingway,
  • Aroon D. Hingorani,
  • Chris Finan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00625-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite the growing interest in the use of human genomic data for drug target identification and validation, the extent to which the spectrum of human disease has been addressed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), or by drug development, and the degree to which these efforts overlap remain unclear. Methods In this study we harmonize and integrate different data sources to create a sample space of all the human drug targets and diseases and identify points of convergence or divergence of GWAS and drug development efforts. Results We show that only 612 of 11,158 diseases listed in Human Disease Ontology have an approved drug treatment in at least one region of the world. Of the 1414 diseases that are the subject of preclinical or clinical phase drug development, only 666 have been investigated in GWAS. Conversely, of the 1914 human diseases that have been the subject of GWAS, 1121 have yet to be investigated in drug development. Conclusions We produce target-disease indication lists to help the pharmaceutical industry to prioritize future drug development efforts based on genetic evidence, academia to prioritize future GWAS for diseases without effective treatments, and both sectors to harness genetic evidence to expand the indications for licensed drugs or to identify repurposing opportunities for clinical candidates that failed in their originally intended indication.