Global Health Action (Dec 2023)

Quality of active case-finding for tuberculosis in India: a national level secondary data analysis

  • Hemant Deepak Shewade,
  • G. Kiruthika,
  • Prabhadevi Ravichandran,
  • Swati Iyer,
  • Aniket Chowdhury,
  • S. Kiran Pradeep,
  • Kathiresan Jeyashree,
  • S. Devika,
  • Joshua Chadwick,
  • Jeromie Wesley Vivian,
  • Dheeraj Tumu,
  • Amar N. Shah,
  • Bhavin Vadera,
  • Venkatesh Roddawar,
  • Sanjay K. Mattoo,
  • Kiran Rade,
  • Raghuram Rao,
  • Manoj V. Murhekar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2256129
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Background India has been implementing active case-finding (ACF) for TB among marginalised and vulnerable (high-risk) populations since 2017. The effectiveness of ACF cycle(s) is dependent on the use of appropriate screening and diagnostic tools and meeting quality indicators. Objectives To determine the number of ACF cycles implemented in 2021 at national, state (n = 36) and district (n = 768) level and quality indicators for the first ACF cycle. Methods In this descriptive study, aggregate TB program data for each ACF activity that was extracted was further aggregated against each ACF cycle at the district level in 2021. One ACF cycle was the period identified to cover all the high-risk populations in the district. Three TB ACF quality indicators were calculated: percentage population screened (≥10%), percentage tested among screened (≥4.8%) and percentage diagnosed among tested (≥5%). We also calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) for diagnosing one person with TB (≤1538). Results Of 768 TB districts, ACF data for 111 were not available. Of the remaining 657 districts, 642 (98%) implemented one, and 15 implemented two to three ACF cycles. None of the districts or states met all three TB ACF quality indicators’ cut-offs. At the national level, for the first ACF cycle, 9.3% of the population were screened, 1% of the screened were tested and 3.7% of the tested were diagnosed. The NNS was 2824: acceptable (≤1538) in institutional facilities and poor for population-based groups. Data were not consistently available to calculate the percentage of i) high-risk population covered, ii) presumptive TB among screened and iii) tested among presumptive. Conclusion In 2021, India implemented one ACF cycle with sub-optimal ACF quality indicators. Reducing the losses between screening and testing, improving data quality and sensitising stakeholders regarding the importance of meeting all ACF quality indicators are recommended.

Keywords