The Eosinophil Changes, Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with an Older Age and a Poor Performance Status

Abstract

Nobuki Furubayashi,1 Akinori Minato,2 Takahito Negishi,1 Naotaka Sakamoto,3 Yoohyun Song,4 Yoshifumi Hori,5 Toshihisa Tomoda,6 Mirii Harada,2 Shingo Tamura,7 Hiroki Kobayashi,1 Yamato Wada,1 Kentaro Kuroiwa,5 Narihito Seki,4 Naohiro Fujimoto,2 Motonobu Nakamura1 1Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; 2Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan; 3Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan; 4Department of Urology, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan; 5Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan; 6Department of Urology, Oita Prefectural Hospital, Oita, Japan; 7Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, JapanCorrespondence: Nobuki Furubayashi, Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Notame 3-1-1, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan, Tel [phone], Fax [phone], Email [email protected]: To evaluate the eosinophil changes, efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients of older age and those with a poor performance status (PS).Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021 were retrospectively examined.Results: 105 patients (median age, 72 years), 71.4% of whom were men, were enrolled. Patients of ≥ 75 years of age were considered to be older patients (n=40), and patients with PS ≥ 2 were considered to have a poor PS (n=10). The objective response and disease control rates were 42.5% and 52.5%, respectively, in older patients and 0% and 10.0%, respectively, in patients with a poor PS. Overall survival (OS) in the older and younger groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with poor survival. Safety analyses demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of any immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including grade ≥ 3, between the older and younger groups. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with the low occurrence of any irAEs. The change of the eosinophil count, the increase of the relative eosinophil count (REC) and the decrease of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the older and younger groups, but showed significant differences between the poor and good PS (PS 0– 1) groups.Conclusion: Pembrolizumab for advanced UC demonstrated similar changes in the eosinophil count, efficacy and toxicity in both older and younger patients. In patients with a poor PS, although toxicity was significantly lower, survival was significantly worse, and neither an increase in REC nor a decrease in NER were observed, but these values showed significant changes in patients with a good PS.Keywords: urothelial carcinoma, pembrolizumab, age, performance status, immune-related adverse events, relative eosinophil count, neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio

Keywords

• urothelial carcinoma pembrolizumab age performance status immune-related adverse events relative eosinophil count neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio