Frontiers in Psychology (Feb 2024)

The effect of age and resilience on the dose–response function between the number of adversity factors and subjective well-being

  • Shulan Hsieh,
  • Shulan Hsieh,
  • Shulan Hsieh,
  • Yun-Hsuan Chang,
  • Yun-Hsuan Chang,
  • Yun-Hsuan Chang,
  • Zai-Fu Yao,
  • Zai-Fu Yao,
  • Zai-Fu Yao,
  • Zai-Fu Yao,
  • Meng-Heng Yang,
  • Cheng-Ta Yang,
  • Cheng-Ta Yang,
  • Cheng-Ta Yang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332124
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundEncountering challenges and stress heightens the vulnerability to mental disorders and diminishes well-being. This study explores the impact of psychological resilience in the context of adverse events, considering age-related variations in its influence on well-being.MethodsA total of 442 participants (male vs. female =48% vs. 52%) with a mean age of 41.79 ± 16.99 years were collected and completed the following questionnaires Brief Betrayal Trauma Survey (BBTS), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), Peace of Mind (PoM), The World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), and Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ). They all underwent structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.ResultsParticipants were categorized based on adversity levels: 34.39% faced one, 26.24% none, and 19.91, 9.50, and 8.14% encountered two, three, and four adversities, respectively. This categorization helps assess the impact on participants’ experiences. As adversity factors increased, PoM decreased. Controlling for age improved PoM model fit (ΔR2 = 0.123, p < 0.001). Adversity factors and age explained 14.6% of PoM variance (df = 2, F = 37.638, p < 0.001). PoM decreased with more adversity and increased with higher age.ConclusionThe study found most participants faced at least one adversity. Adversity negatively affected PoM scores, while resilience acted as a protective factor. Resilience plays a crucial role in buffering the impact of adversities on well-being. Among those with high adversity, higher resilience correlated with stronger DMN-right frontal pole connectivity. Brain volume showed no significant differences, but the quality of life and social support varied between subgroups, with no differences in personal demographic and biophysical features.

Keywords