PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Advantages of score-based delirium detection compared to a clinical delirium assessment-a retrospective, monocentric cohort study.

  • Markus Jäckel,
  • Nico Aicher,
  • Xavier Bemtgen,
  • Jonathan Rilinger,
  • Viviane Zotzmann,
  • Paul Marc Biever,
  • Alexander Supady,
  • Peter Stachon,
  • Daniel Duerschmied,
  • Tobias Wengenmayer,
  • Christoph Bode,
  • Dawid Leander Staudacher

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259841
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 11
p. e0259841

Abstract

Read online

PurposeDelirium is an underdiagnosed complication on intensive care units (ICU). We hypothesized that a score-based delirium detection using the Nudesc score identifies more patients compared to a traditional diagnosis of delirium by ICU physicians.MethodsIn this retrospective study, all patients treated on a general medical ICU with 30 beds in a university hospital in 2019 were analyzed. Primary outcome was a documented physician diagnosis of delirium, or a delirium score ≥2 using the Nudesc.ResultsIn 205/943 included patients (21.7%), delirium was diagnosed by ICU physicians compared to 438/943 (46.4%; ratio 2.1) by Nudesc≥2. Both assessments were independent predictors of ICU stay (pConclusionDelirium in patients with hypoactive delirium, female patients and those below 60 years was underdiagnosed by physicians. The score-based delirium diagnosis detected delirium more frequently and correlated with ICU mortality and stay.