Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (Aug 2024)

Unveiling the kinetic versatility of aryl-alcohol oxidases with different electron acceptors

  • Ana Serrano,
  • Paula Cinca-Fernando,
  • Paula Cinca-Fernando,
  • Juan Carro,
  • Adrián Velázquez-Campoy,
  • Adrián Velázquez-Campoy,
  • Adrián Velázquez-Campoy,
  • Adrián Velázquez-Campoy,
  • Marta Martínez-Júlvez,
  • Marta Martínez-Júlvez,
  • Ángel T. Martínez,
  • Patricia Ferreira,
  • Patricia Ferreira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1440598
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Aryl-alcohol oxidase (AAO) shows a pronounced duality as oxidase and dehydrogenase similar to that described for other glucose-methanol-choline (GMC) oxidase/dehydrogenase superfamily proteins involved in lignocellulose decomposition. In this work, we detail the overall mechanism of AAOs from Pleurotus eryngii and Bjerkandera adusta for catalyzing the oxidation of natural aryl-alcohol substrates using either oxygen or quinones as electron acceptors and describe the crystallographic structure of AAO from B. adusta in complex with a product analogue.Methods: Kinetic studies with 4-methoxybenzyl and 3-chloro-4- methoxybenzyl alcohols, including both transient-state and steady-state analyses, along with interaction studies, provide insight into the oxidase and dehydrogenase mechanisms of these enzymes. Moreover, the resolution of the crystal structure of AAO from B. adusta allowed us to compare their overall folding and the structure of the active sites of both AAOs in relation to their activities.Results and Discussion: Although both enzymes show similar mechanistic properties, notable differences are highlighted in this study. In B. adusta, the AAO oxidase activity is limited by the reoxidation of the flavin, while in P. eryngii the slower step takes place during the reductive half-reaction, which determines the overall reaction rate. By contrast, dehydrogenase activity in both enzymes, irrespective of the alcohol participating in the reaction, is limited by the hydroquinone release from the active site. Despite these differences, both AAOs are more efficient as dehydrogenases, supporting the physiological role of this activity in lignocellulosic decay. This dual activity would allow these enzymes to adapt to different environments based on the available electron acceptors.

Keywords