Journal of Clinical Medicine (Aug 2023)

Dual PPRαϒ Agonists for the Management of Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

  • Antonio da Silva Menezes Junior,
  • Vinícius Martins Rodrigues Oliveira,
  • Izadora Caiado Oliveira,
  • André Maroccolo de Sousa,
  • Ana Júlia Prego Santana,
  • Davi Peixoto Craveiro Carvalho,
  • Ricardo Figueiredo Paro Piai,
  • Fernando Henrique Matos,
  • Arthur Marot de Paiva,
  • Gabriel Baêta Branquinho Reis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175674
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 17
p. 5674

Abstract

Read online

Saroglitazar is a novel medication for dyslipidemia, but its specific effects remain unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for managing dyslipidemia. The PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 2 and 4 mg of saroglitazar with placebos for treating dyslipidemia. A random-effects model calculated the pooled mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The study included seven RCTs involving 1975 patients. Overall, 340 (31.0%) and 513 (46.8%) participants received 2 and 4 mg of saroglitazar, respectively; 242 (22.11%) received the placebo. The mean ages ranged from 40.2 to 62.6 years, and 436 (39.8%) were women. Compared to the control group, 4 mg of saroglitazar significantly decreased the triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels but did not affect the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Furthermore, the alanine aminotransferase level significantly decreased, the creatine level significantly increased, and body weight did not differ between the groups. Finally, 4 mg of saroglitazar, compared to 2 mg, significantly lowered the triglyceride level. Saroglitazar (4 mg) may be an effective treatment, but safety concerns remain.

Keywords