GNSS/Accelerometer Adaptive Coupled Landslide Deformation Monitoring Technology

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning technology has become the most effective method for real-time three-dimensional landslide monitoring. However, the GNSS observation signal is easily affected by the presence of a complex landslide environment with high occlusion and strong interference, in which case its accuracy and reliability cannot meet the requirements of landslide deformation monitoring. Although the accelerometers have strong autonomous working capacities and can complement the GNSS landslide monitoring technology, regular GNSS/accelerometer coupled deformation monitoring technology relies on high-quality GNSS measurement information in order to obtain high-precision accelerometer-reckoned results, derived by accurately estimating the baseline shift error (BSE). When the GNSS signal suffers severe interference, the GNSS monitoring error will be partially absorbed by the BSE component after Kalman filtering, resulting in the divergence of the deformation solution. In this study, an abnormal observation variance inflation model was used to process the simulated landslide monitoring data (GNSS and accelerometer raw observation) for three typical scenes—GNSS signal normally locked, signal partially lost, and short-term interruption. The results were as follows: (1) When the GNSS signal was normally locked, the accuracy was comparable to that of the coupled solution employing an accelerometer (the Root Mean Square (RMS) values in the East (E), North (N) and Upward (U) directions were 0.11 cm, 0.33 cm, and 0.30 cm, respectively). (2) When the GNSS signal was partially lost, the accelerometer could effectively suppress the low-precision float solution of the GNSS, but here, the accuracy of the coupled solution would also decrease with the duration of the floats (the RMS values were E—1.21 cm, N—0.31 cm, and U: 0.58—cm, respectively, when the floats lasted for 10 s, and increased to E—3.09 cm, N—0.39 cm, and U—1.14 cm when they lasted for 20 s, wherein E was the main simulated sliding direction). (3) When the GNSS signal was interrupted for a short time, the accuracy of the coupled solution gradually decreased during continuous interruption, and decreased more quickly during the sliding period of the landslide (when the interruption persisted for 10 s, the RMS values in the simulated landslide stability period were E—0.61 cm, N—0.24 cm, and U—0.25 cm, respectively, while in the simulated landslide sliding period they reached E—4.10 cm, N—6.84 cm, and U—2.30 cm). However, raw observations of the accelerometer could still effectively be used to assist in identifying the real state of the landslide, thereby providing auxiliary information pertinent to early landslide disaster warning.

Keywords

• landslide deformation monitoring
• accelerometer
• GNSS
• variance inflation model
• baseline shift error