Frontiers in Aging (Dec 2024)

Critical review of aging clocks and factors that may influence the pace of aging

  • Mildred Min,
  • Mildred Min,
  • Mildred Min,
  • Caitlin Egli,
  • Caitlin Egli,
  • Caitlin Egli,
  • Ajay S. Dulai,
  • Ajay S. Dulai,
  • Raja K. Sivamani,
  • Raja K. Sivamani,
  • Raja K. Sivamani,
  • Raja K. Sivamani,
  • Raja K. Sivamani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2024.1487260
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5

Abstract

Read online

Background and objectivesAging clocks are computational models designed to measure biological age and aging rate based on age-related markers including epigenetic, proteomic, and immunomic changes, gut and skin microbiota, among others. In this narrative review, we aim to discuss the currently available aging clocks, ranging from epigenetic aging clocks to visual skin aging clocks.MethodsWe performed a literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE databases with keywords including: “aging clock,” “aging,” “biological age,” “chronological age,” “epigenetic,” “proteomic,” “microbiome,” “telomere,” “metabolic,” “inflammation,” “glycomic,” “lifestyle,” “nutrition,” “diet,” “exercise,” “psychosocial,” and “technology.”ResultsNotably, several CpG regions, plasma proteins, inflammatory and immune biomarkers, microbiome shifts, neuroimaging changes, and visual skin aging parameters demonstrated roles in aging and aging clock predictions. Further analysis on the most predictive CpGs and biomarkers is warranted. Limitations of aging clocks include technical noise which may be corrected with additional statistical techniques, and the diversity and applicability of samples utilized.ConclusionAging clocks have significant therapeutic potential to better understand aging and the influence of chronic inflammation and diseases in an expanding older population.

Keywords