Kolonialita jako druhá tvář modernity. K současné latinskoamerické postkoloniální kritice modernity

Historicka Sociologie. 2018;2012(1):75-94 DOI 10.14712/23363525.2014.38


Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Historicka Sociologie

ISSN: 1804-0616 (Print); 2336-3525 (Online)

Publisher: Karolinum Press

Society/Institution: Faculty of Humanities Charles University in Prague

LCC Subject Category: Social Sciences: Sociology (General)

Country of publisher: Czechia

Language of fulltext: Slovak, English, Czech

Full-text formats available: PDF



Veronika Sušová-Salminen


Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 50 weeks


Abstract | Full Text

The paper focuses on the Latin American perspective on modernity, especially on the Peruvian sociologist Aníbal Quijano’s notion of coloniality. Coloniality is explained as a theoretical framework for critical reflection of modernity with an emphasis on the forms of knowledge (episteme) and on non-Western, more specifically Latin American historical experiences and perspectives. The aim is to introduce some Latin American efforts to critically understand coloniality as the other face of modernity and to develop a distinctive critique of capitalism, globalisation and Eurocentrism in their historical dynamics. In the first part, the paper briefly introduces Latin America as a geocultural place and a object of social research in a historical perspective. Special attention is paid to the question of racial classification and authenticity. In the second part, the paper focuses on the notion of coloniality as it was conceptualised by A. Quijano and by other Latin American authors. In the third and fourth parts, the paper deals with the problem of coloniality in wider epistemic contexts of modern social sciences and in relation to the notion of alterity and to the question of decolonisation of social scientific thinking. The final discussion addresses some of inspirational and problematic points of this conception such as problems of decolonisation, intellectual dependency and critique, and the problem of conceptualisation of differences in scientific discourses.