Ecosphere (May 2021)

Elevational gradients strongly mediate habitat selection patterns in a nocturnal predator

  • H. Anu Kramer,
  • Gavin M. Jones,
  • Van R. Kane,
  • Bryce Bartl‐Geller,
  • Jonathan T. Kane,
  • Sheila A. Whitmore,
  • William J. Berigan,
  • Brian P. Dotters,
  • Kevin N. Roberts,
  • Sarah C. Sawyer,
  • John J. Keane,
  • Malcolm P. North,
  • R. J. GutiÉrrez,
  • M. Zachariah Peery

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3500
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Mountain ecosystems contain strong elevational gradients in climate and vegetation that shape species distributions and the structure of animal communities. Nevertheless, studies of habitat selection for individual species rarely account for such gradients that often result in species being managed uniformly across their range, which may not improve conservation as intended. Therefore, we characterized variation in nocturnal habitat selection by 18 GPS‐tagged California spotted owls (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) along a 1400‐m elevational gradient in the Sierra Nevada, California. We characterized three‐dimensional forest structure with light detection and ranging data that we used in mixed‐effects resource‐ and step‐selection analyses of owl habitat selection. At lower elevations, owls selected stands with shorter trees, sites closer to hard edges between tall forests and open areas, sites with less diversity in forest seral types and sites with more ridge and southwest aspects. In contrast, owls at higher elevations selected the opposite. Within public forests that had taller trees and within their home range core (45% kernel density estimate of GPS points) areas, owls selected forests with less and more canopy cover at low and high elevations, respectively. Outside of their core areas, owls selected areas with fewer and more tall trees at low and high elevations, respectively. These findings may be explained by elevational gradients in prey distribution and variation in owl diet because owls consume more woodrats (Neotoma spp; earlier seral species) at lower elevations and more flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus; older forest species) at higher elevations. Thus, at low elevations and in areas unlikely to support nesting, spotted owls could benefit from management that promotes woodrat habitat by encouraging oak regeneration and creating small brushy openings within forests with shorter (younger) trees. Conversely, at higher elevations, (1) enhancing flying squirrel habitat by promoting large trees and denser canopy on mesic sites and (2) managing for greater cover type diversity on southwest‐facing slopes and ridgetops is more likely to improve foraging habitat quality for spotted owls. The patterns of owl selection over elevational gradients has not been explicitly considered in most habitat management plans but clearly would improve management throughout mountain ecosystems.

Keywords