Biologics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Clinical Practice: A Calabria (Southern Italy) Prospective Pharmacovigilance Study
Martina Tallarico,
Caterina Palleria,
Livia Ruffolo,
Rocco Spagnuolo,
Maria Diana Naturale,
Adele Emanuela De Francesco,
Caterina De Sarro,
Rossella Romeo,
Rita Citraro,
Patrizia Doldo,
Ludovico Abenavoli,
Luca Gallelli,
Francesco Luzza,
Antonio Leo,
Giovambattista De Sarro
Affiliations
Martina Tallarico
Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Caterina Palleria
System and Applied Pharmacology@University Magna Grecia (FAS@UMG) Research Center, Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Livia Ruffolo
Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Rocco Spagnuolo
Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Maria Diana Naturale
Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Background: The use of immune-modifying biological agents has markedly changed the clinical course and the management of Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Active post-marketing surveillance programs are fundamental to early recognize expected and unexpected adverse events (AEs), representing a powerful tool to better determine the safety profiles of biologics in a real-world setting. Methods: This study aimed to identify the occurrence of AEs and therapeutic failures linked to biological drugs used in gastroenterology units during a prospective pharmacovigilance program in Southern Italy. Patients affected by IBDs and treated with a biologic agent, from 1 January 2019, to 31 December 2021 (study period) in three gastroenterology units were enrolled. Results: Overall, 358 patients with a diagnosis of active Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis satisfying inclusion criteria have been enrolled. Infliximab (IFX) was the most administered drug at the index date (214; 59.8%), followed by Adalimumab (ADA; 89; 24.9%), Golimumab (GOL; 37; 10.3%), Vedolizumab (VDZ; 17; 4.7%) and Ustekimumab (UST; 1; 0.3%). Seventy-three patients (20.4%) experienced at least one AE, while 62 patients (17.3%) had therapeutic ineffectiveness. No serious AEs were reported in the follow-up period in the enrolled patients. AEs have been described with IFX (50/214; p = 0.47), GOL (7/37; p = 0.78), ADA (13/89; p = 0.18), and VDZ (3/17; p = 0.52), no AEs have been noticed with UST (0/1). Conclusions: Based on the low rate of AEs observed and withdrawal from treatment, our data seem to corroborate the favorable beneficial/risk profile of biologics for IBDs.