On the generalizability of diffusion MRI signal representations across acquisition parameters, sequences and tissue types: Chronicles of the MEMENTO challenge
Alberto De Luca,
Andrada Ianus,
Alexander Leemans,
Marco Palombo,
Noam Shemesh,
Hui Zhang,
Daniel C. Alexander,
Markus Nilsson,
Martijn Froeling,
Geert-Jan Biessels,
Mauro Zucchelli,
Matteo Frigo,
Enes Albay,
Sara Sedlar,
Abib Alimi,
Samuel Deslauriers-Gauthier,
Rachid Deriche,
Rutger Fick,
Maryam Afzali,
Tomasz Pieciak,
Fabian Bogusz,
Santiago Aja-Fernández,
Evren Özarslan,
Derek K. Jones,
Haoze Chen,
Mingwu Jin,
Zhijie Zhang,
Fengxiang Wang,
Vishwesh Nath,
Prasanna Parvathaneni,
Jan Morez,
Jan Sijbers,
Ben Jeurissen,
Shreyas Fadnavis,
Stefan Endres,
Ariel Rokem,
Eleftherios Garyfallidis,
Irina Sanchez,
Vesna Prchkovska,
Paulo Rodrigues,
Bennet A. Landman,
Kurt G. Schilling
Affiliations
Alberto De Luca
PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Corresponding author.
Andrada Ianus
Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
Alexander Leemans
PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Marco Palombo
Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Noam Shemesh
Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
Hui Zhang
Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Daniel C. Alexander
Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Markus Nilsson
Clinical Sciences Lund, Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Martijn Froeling
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Geert-Jan Biessels
Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Cardiff University Brain Research, Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Tomasz Pieciak
AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland; LPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Fabian Bogusz
AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Santiago Aja-Fernández
LPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Evren Özarslan
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Derek K. Jones
Cardiff University Brain Research, Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Haoze Chen
School of Instruments and Electronics, North University of China, Taiyuan, China
Mingwu Jin
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, USA
Zhijie Zhang
School of Instruments and Electronics, North University of China, Taiyuan, China
Fengxiang Wang
School of Instruments and Electronics, North University of China, Taiyuan, China
Vishwesh Nath
NVIDIA Corporation, Bethesda, USA
Prasanna Parvathaneni
National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA
Jan Morez
Imec-Vision lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Jan Sijbers
Imec-Vision lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Ben Jeurissen
Imec-Vision lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Shreyas Fadnavis
Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Stefan Endres
Leibniz Institute for Materials Engineering — IWT, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Ariel Rokem
Department of Psychology and the eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
Eleftherios Garyfallidis
Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Irina Sanchez
QMENTA Inc, Boston, USA
Vesna Prchkovska
QMENTA Inc, Boston, USA
Paulo Rodrigues
QMENTA Inc, Boston, USA
Bennet A. Landman
Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
Kurt G. Schilling
Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has become an invaluable tool to assess the microstructural organization of brain tissue. Depending on the specific acquisition settings, the dMRI signal encodes specific properties of the underlying diffusion process. In the last two decades, several signal representations have been proposed to fit the dMRI signal and decode such properties. Most methods, however, are tested and developed on a limited amount of data, and their applicability to other acquisition schemes remains unknown. With this work, we aimed to shed light on the generalizability of existing dMRI signal representations to different diffusion encoding parameters and brain tissue types. To this end, we organized a community challenge - named MEMENTO, making available the same datasets for fair comparisons across algorithms and techniques. We considered two state-of-the-art diffusion datasets, including single-diffusion-encoding (SDE) spin-echo data from a human brain with over 3820 unique diffusion weightings (the MASSIVE dataset), and double (oscillating) diffusion encoding data (DDE/DODE) of a mouse brain including over 2520 unique data points. A subset of the data sampled in 5 different voxels was openly distributed, and the challenge participants were asked to predict the remaining part of the data. After one year, eight participant teams submitted a total of 80 signal fits. For each submission, we evaluated the mean squared error, the variance of the prediction error and the Bayesian information criteria. The received submissions predicted either multi-shell SDE data (37%) or DODE data (22%), followed by cartesian SDE data (19%) and DDE (18%). Most submissions predicted the signals measured with SDE remarkably well, with the exception of low and very strong diffusion weightings. The prediction of DDE and DODE data seemed more challenging, likely because none of the submissions explicitly accounted for diffusion time and frequency. Next to the choice of the model, decisions on fit procedure and hyperparameters play a major role in the prediction performance, highlighting the importance of optimizing and reporting such choices. This work is a community effort to highlight strength and limitations of the field at representing dMRI acquired with trending encoding schemes, gaining insights into how different models generalize to different tissue types and fiber configurations over a large range of diffusion encodings.