Quantitative Evaluation of Chinese Central Government's Family Doctor Contract Service Policy Based on PMC Index Model

Abstract

Background Population aging is getting worse in our country. Family doctor contract service plays an important role in boosting the construction of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system and establishing a reasonable and orderly medical order. Current research about family doctor contract service policy mainly focus on qualitative evaluation, and there are few researchers use tools to quantitatively evaluate each individual representative policy. Objective This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the pros and cons of six Chinese central government policies about family doctor contract service, thus, proposing strategies and measures to promote the high-quality development of our country's family doctor contract service, and helping the construction of healthy China. Methods We searched Peking University's PKULAW.com and websites of some relevant ministries of the State Council of China from January 1, 2015 to April 30, 2022. The key word was "family doctor". The software ROSTCM 6.0 was used for text mining. Based on the results, this study selected central government policies about family doctor contract services, then used the PMC index model to quantitatively evaluate these policies. Results This study included thirty-two policies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The top five high-frequency keywords in the field of family doctor services are "contract service" (n=274) , "health" (n=272) , "medical" (n=264) , "family doctor" (n=225) , and "contract" (n=180) . They were marked as P1-P6, respectively. In terms of methods and other aspects, the scores of each dimension are relatively high. The results of quantitative evaluation showed that the ranking of policies is P1>P3>P2>P6>P4>P5. Three policies were rated as excellent, the other three were rated as acceptable. The scores were relatively high in the policy content, policy nature, policy evaluation, policy field and policy role. Conclusion Our country's family doctor contract service policy had a relatively broad content and is relatively mature. It is suggested to pay attention to the combination of long-term, medium-term and short-term validity of the policies, improve incentive approaches from multiple perspectives, enhance the sense of professional honor of family doctors, and use a variety of policy tools and policy action.

Keywords

• contracted family doctor services|health policy|policy evaluation|quantitative evaluation|pmc index model