BMJ Open (May 2022)

Continuity of community-based healthcare provision during COVID-19: a multicountry interrupted time series analysis

  • Caroline Whidden,
  • Daniel Palazuelos,
  • Madeleine Ballard,
  • Jane Yang,
  • Molly Christiansen,
  • Carey Westgate,
  • Amanda Yembrick,
  • Diego Lassala,
  • Fabien Munyaneza,
  • Helen E Olsen,
  • Anoushka Millear,
  • Dianne Thakura,
  • Afra Nuwasiima,
  • Daniele J Ressler,
  • Wycliffe Okoth Omwanda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052407
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Background Pandemics often precipitate declines in essential health service utilisation, which can ultimately kill more people than the disease outbreak itself. There is some evidence, however, that the presence of adequately supported community health workers (CHWs), that is, financially remunerated, trained, supplied and supervised in line with WHO guidelines, may blunt the impact of health system shocks. Yet, adequate support for CHWs is often missing or uneven across countries. This study assesses whether adequately supported CHWs can maintain the continuity of essential community-based health service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods Interrupted time series analysis. Monthly routine data from 27 districts across four countries in sub-Saharan Africa were extracted from CHW and facility reports for the period January 2018–June 2021. Descriptive analysis, null hypothesis testing, and segmented regression analysis were used to assess the presence and magnitude of a possible disruption in care utilisation after the earliest reported cases of COVID-19.Results CHWs across all sites were supported in line with the WHO Guideline and received COVID-19 adapted protocols, training and personal protective equipment within 45 days after the first case in each country. We found no disruptions to the coverage of proactive household visits or integrated community case management (iCCM) assessments provided by these prepared and protected CHWs, as well as no disruptions to the speed with which iCCM was received, pregnancies were registered or postnatal care received.Conclusion CHWs who were equipped and prepared for the pandemic were able to maintain speed and coverage of community-delivered care during the pandemic period. Given that the majority of CHWs globally remain unpaid and largely unsupported, this paper suggests that the opportunity cost of not professionalising CHWs may be larger than previously estimated, particularly in light of the inevitability of future pandemics.