JTO Clinical and Research Reports (Feb 2021)

Two-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study of Integrated Smoking Cessation in a Lung Cancer Screening Program

  • Alain Tremblay, MDCM,
  • Niloofar Taghizadeh, PhD,
  • Paul MacEachern, MD,
  • Paul Burrowes, MD,
  • Andrew J. Graham, MD,
  • Stephen C. Lam, MD,
  • Huiming Yang, MD,
  • Rommy Koetzler, MD, PhD,
  • Martin C. Tammemägi, PhD,
  • Kathryn Taylor, PhD,
  • Eric L.R. Bédard, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 2
p. 100097

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Smoking cessation activities incorporated into lung cancer screening programs have been broadly recommended, but studies to date have not exhibited increased quit rates associated with cessation programs in this setting. We aimed to determine the long-term effectiveness of smoking cessation counseling in smokers presenting for lung cancer screening. Methods: This was a randomized control trial of an intensive, telephone-based smoking cessation counseling intervention incorporating lung cancer screening results versus usual care (information pamphlet). This analysis reports on the long-term impact (24-mo) of the intervention on abstinence from smoking. Results: A total of 337 active smokers who participated in the screening study were randomized to active smoking cessation counseling (n = 171) or control arm (n = 174) and completed a 24-month assessment. The 30-day smoking abstinence rates at 24 months postrandomization was 18.3% and 21.4% in the control and intervention arms, respectively—a 3.1% difference (95% confidence interval: −5.4 to 11.6, p = 0.48). No statistically significant differences in the 7-day abstinence, the use of pharmacologic cessation aids, nicotine replacement therapies, nor intent to quit in the following 30 days were noted (p > 0.05). The abstinence rates at 24-months were higher overall than at 12-months (19.9% versus 13.3%, p < 0.001), and smoking intensity was lower than at baseline for ongoing smokers. Conclusions: A telephone-based smoking cessation counseling intervention incorporating lung cancer screening results did not result in increased long-term cessation rates versus written information alone in unselected smokers undergoing lung cancer screening. Overall, quit rates were high and continued to improve throughout participation in the screening program. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02431962).

Keywords