Advances in Rheumatology (Jun 2024)

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

  • Edgard Torres dos Reis-Neto,
  • Luciana Parente Costa Seguro,
  • Emília Inoue Sato,
  • Eduardo Ferreira Borba,
  • Evandro Mendes Klumb,
  • Lilian Tereza Lavras Costallat,
  • Marta Maria das Chagas Medeiros,
  • Eloisa Bonfá,
  • Nafice Costa Araújo,
  • Simone Appenzeller,
  • Ana Carolina de Oliveira e Silva Montandon,
  • Emily Figueiredo Neves Yuki,
  • Roberto Cordeiro de Andrade Teixeira,
  • Rosa Weiss Telles,
  • Danielle Christinne Soares do Egypto,
  • Francinne Machado Ribeiro,
  • Andrese Aline Gasparin,
  • Antonio Silaide de Araujo Junior,
  • Cláudia Lopes Santoro Neiva,
  • Debora Cerqueira Calderaro,
  • Odirlei Andre Monticielo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-024-00386-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 64, no. 1
pp. 1 – 25

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). Methods Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion. Results All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy. Conclusion This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.