JMIR Formative Research (Nov 2021)

Dropout From an Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Qualitative Study

  • Kate Lawler,
  • Caroline Earley,
  • Ladislav Timulak,
  • Angel Enrique,
  • Derek Richards

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/26221
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 11
p. e26221

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundTreatment dropout continues to be reported from internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) interventions, and lower completion rates are generally associated with lower treatment effect sizes. However, evidence is emerging to suggest that completion of a predefined number of modules is not always necessary for clinical benefit or consideration of the needs of each individual patient. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to perform a qualitative analysis of patients’ experiences with an iCBT intervention in a routine care setting to achieve a deeper insight into the phenomenon of dropout. MethodsA total of 15 purposively sampled participants (female: 8/15, 53%) from a larger parent randomized controlled trial were interviewed via telephone using a semistructured interview schedule that was developed based on the existing literature and research on dropout in iCBT. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-interpretive approach. ResultsThe experience of treatment leading to dropout can be understood in terms of 10 domains: relationship to technology, motivation to start, background knowledge and attitudes toward iCBT, perceived change in motivation, usage of the program, changes due to the intervention, engagement with content, experience interacting with the supporter, experience of web-based communication, and termination of the supported period. ConclusionsPatients who drop out of treatment can be distinguished in terms of their change in motivation: those who felt ready to leave treatment early and those who had negative reasons for dropping out. These 2 groups of participants have different treatment experiences, revealing the potential attributes and nonattributes of dropout. The reported between-group differences should be examined further to consider those attributes that are strongly descriptive of the experience and regarded less important than those that have become loosely affiliated.