JMIR Cancer (Nov 2021)

Digital Technical and Informal Resources of Breast Cancer Patients From 2012 to 2020: Questionnaire-Based Longitudinal Trend Study

  • Christoph A Mallmann,
  • Christian M Domröse,
  • Lars Schröder,
  • David Engelhardt,
  • Frederik Bach,
  • Helena Rueckel,
  • Alina Abramian,
  • Christina Kaiser,
  • Alexander Mustea,
  • Andree Faridi,
  • Wolfram Malter,
  • Peter Mallmann,
  • Christian Rudlowski,
  • Oliver Zivanovic,
  • Michael R Mallmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/20964
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 4
p. e20964

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundDigitalization offers enormous potential in medicine. In the era of digitalization, the development of the use of digital, technical, and informal resources of breast cancer patients and factors influencing the degree of digitization of patients has been insufficiently researched. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the development of the use of digital technical and informal resources in a well-defined patient cohort. MethodsA longitudinal study on 513 breast cancer patients from 2012 to 2020 was conducted using a questionnaire that included the main aspects of the degree of digitalization, including digital device availability and use, stationary and mobile internet access and use, and communication and information seeking regarding breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. ResultsThe majority of patients (421/513, 82.1%) owned the technical resources to benefit from eHealth, used the internet to obtain information (292/509, 57.4%), and were willing to use new eHealth solutions (379/426, 89%). Two-thirds of the patients discussed information about their cancer on the internet with their doctor, one-third found additional treatment options on the internet, and 15.3% (44/287) of the patients stated that this had changed their cancer therapy. The degree of digitization is increasing yet still significantly depends on 3 factors: (1) age (whereas 100% [39/39] of the 70-year-old group used the internet), (2) education (internet use significantly depended on education, as only 51.8% [59/114] of patients with primary school education used the internet, but 82.4% [126/153] with middle school education and 90.3% [213/236] with high school education used the internet; P<.001), and (3) household size (67.7% [111/164] of patients living alone used the internet, whereas 84.7% [287/339] of patients living in a house with ≥2 people used the internet; P<.001). ConclusionsTo implement digital solutions in health care, knowledge of the composition and degree of the use of digital technical and informal resources of the patient group for which the respective solution is developed is crucial for success. Trial RegistrationGerman Register of Clinical Studies DRKS00012364; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012364