Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing (Dec 2023)

Costs Related to Diverting Ileostomy After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Healthcare Cost Analysis Based on Nationwide Registers

  • Ursula Dahlstrand PhD, MD,
  • Pontus Gustafsson MD,
  • Pia Näsvall PhD, MD,
  • Jeaneth Johansson PhD,
  • Ulf Gunnarsson PhD, MD,
  • Ulrik Lindforss PhD, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231212126
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 60

Abstract

Read online

Low anterior resection for rectal cancer often includes a diverting loop-ileostomy to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. Reversal of the stoma is often delayed, which can incur health-care costs on different levels. The aim is to, on population basis, determine stoma-related costs, and to investigate habitual and socioeconomic factors associated to the level of cost. Multi-register design with data from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry, the National Prescribed Drug Register, Statistics Sweden and cost-administrative data from the National Board of Health and Welfare. Data was gathered for 3564 patients with rectal cancer surgery 2007 to 2013, for 3 years following the surgery. Factors influencing the cost of inpatient care and stoma-related consumables were assessed with linear regression analyses. All monthly costs were higher for females (consumables P < .001 and in-patient care P = .031). Post-secondary education ( P = .003) and younger age ( P = .020) was associated with a higher cost for consumables while suffering a surgical complication was associated with increased cost for inpatient care ( P < .001). Patients who had their stoma longer had lower monthly costs (consumables P < .001 and in-patient care P < .001). Female gender, longer duration of stoma, young age, and higher education are associated with higher costs for the care of a diverting stoma after rectal cancer surgery. This study does not allow for analyses of causality but the results together with deepened analyses of underlying reasons form a proper basis for decisions in health care planning and allocation of resources. These findings may have implications on the debate of equal care for all.