PeerJ (Jun 2016)

Interrater reliability of quantitative ultrasound using force feedback among examiners with varied levels of experience

  • Michael O. Harris-Love,
  • Catheeja Ismail,
  • Reza Monfaredi,
  • Haniel J. Hernandez,
  • Donte Pennington,
  • Paula Woletz,
  • Valerie McIntosh,
  • Bernadette Adams,
  • Marc R. Blackman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2146
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4
p. e2146

Abstract

Read online Read online

Background. Quantitative ultrasound measures are influenced by multiple external factors including examiner scanning force. Force feedback may foster the acquisition of reliable morphometry measures under a variety of scanning conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of force-feedback image acquisition and morphometry over a range of examiner-generated forces using a muscle tissue-mimicking ultrasound phantom. Methods. Sixty material thickness measures were acquired from a muscle tissue mimicking phantom using B-mode ultrasound scanning by six examiners with varied experience levels (i.e., experienced, intermediate, and novice). Estimates of interrater reliability and measurement error with force feedback scanning were determined for the examiners. In addition, criterion-based reliability was determined using material deformation values across a range of examiner scanning forces (1–10 Newtons) via automated and manually acquired image capture methods using force feedback. Results. All examiners demonstrated acceptable interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = .98, p .90, p < .001), independent of their level of experience. The measurement error among all examiners was 1.5%–2.9% across all applied stress conditions. Conclusion. Manual image capture with force feedback may aid the reliability of morphometry measures across a range of examiner scanning forces, and allow for consistent performance among examiners with differing levels of experience.

Keywords