BMC Cancer (May 2020)

Sex-specific impact of patterns of imageable tumor growth on survival of primary glioblastoma patients

  • Paula Whitmire,
  • Cassandra R. Rickertsen,
  • Andrea Hawkins-Daarud,
  • Eduardo Carrasco,
  • Julia Lorence,
  • Gustavo De Leon,
  • Lee Curtin,
  • Spencer Bayless,
  • Kamala Clark-Swanson,
  • Noah C. Peeri,
  • Christina Corpuz,
  • Christine Paula Lewis-de los Angeles,
  • Bernard R. Bendok,
  • Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar,
  • Sujay Vora,
  • Maciej M. Mrugala,
  • Leland S. Hu,
  • Lei Wang,
  • Alyx Porter,
  • Priya Kumthekar,
  • Sandra K. Johnston,
  • Kathleen M. Egan,
  • Robert Gatenby,
  • Peter Canoll,
  • Joshua B. Rubin,
  • Kristin R. Swanson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06816-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Sex is recognized as a significant determinant of outcome among glioblastoma patients, but the relative prognostic importance of glioblastoma features has not been thoroughly explored for sex differences. Methods Combining multi-modal MR images, biomathematical models, and patient clinical information, this investigation assesses which pretreatment variables have a sex-specific impact on the survival of glioblastoma patients (299 males and 195 females). Results Among males, tumor (T1Gd) radius was a predictor of overall survival (HR = 1.027, p = 0.044). Among females, higher tumor cell net invasion rate was a significant detriment to overall survival (HR = 1.011, p < 0.001). Female extreme survivors had significantly smaller tumors (T1Gd) (p = 0.010 t-test), but tumor size was not correlated with female overall survival (p = 0.955 CPH). Both male and female extreme survivors had significantly lower tumor cell net proliferation rates than other patients (M p = 0.004, F p = 0.001, t-test). Conclusion Despite similar distributions of the MR imaging parameters between males and females, there was a sex-specific difference in how these parameters related to outcomes.

Keywords