Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Apr 2020)

High-resolution vertical distribution and sources of HONO and NO<sub>2</sub> in the nocturnal boundary layer in urban Beijing, China

  • F. Meng,
  • F. Meng,
  • M. Qin,
  • K. Tang,
  • K. Tang,
  • J. Duan,
  • W. Fang,
  • S. Liang,
  • S. Liang,
  • K. Ye,
  • K. Ye,
  • P. Xie,
  • P. Xie,
  • P. Xie,
  • P. Xie,
  • Y. Sun,
  • Y. Sun,
  • Y. Sun,
  • C. Xie,
  • C. Ye,
  • P. Fu,
  • P. Fu,
  • J. Liu,
  • J. Liu,
  • J. Liu,
  • W. Liu,
  • W. Liu,
  • W. Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5071-2020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20
pp. 5071 – 5092

Abstract

Read online

Nitrous acid (HONO), an important precursor of the hydroxyl radical (OH), plays a key role in atmospheric chemistry, but its sources are still debated. The production of HONO on aerosol surfaces or on ground surfaces in nocturnal atmospheres remains controversial. The vertical profile provides vertical information on HONO and NO2 to understand the nocturnal HONO production and loss. In this study, we report the first high-resolution (<2.5 m) nocturnal vertical profiles of HONO and NO2 measured from in situ instruments on a movable container that was lifted on the side wiring of a 325 m meteorological tower in Beijing, China. High-resolution vertical profiles revealed the negative gradients of HONO and NO2 in nocturnal boundary layers, and a shallow inversion layer affected the vertical distribution of HONO. The vertical distribution of HONO was consistent with stratification and layering in the nocturnal urban atmosphere below 250 m. The increase in the HONO ∕ NO2 ratio was observed throughout the column from the clean episode to the haze episode, and relatively constant HONO∕NO2 ratios in the residual layer were observed during the haze episode. Direct HONO emissions from traffic contributed 29.3 % ± 12.4 % to the ambient HONO concentrations at night. The ground surface dominates HONO production by heterogeneous uptake of NO2 during clean episodes. In contrast, the HONO production on aerosol surfaces (30–300 ppt) explained the observed HONO increases (15–368 ppt) in the residual layer, suggesting that the aerosol surface dominates HONO production aloft during haze episodes, while the surface production of HONO and direct emissions into the overlying air are minor contributors. Average dry deposition rates of 0.74±0.31 and 1.55±0.32 ppb h−1 were estimated during the clean and haze episodes, respectively, implying that significant quantities of HONO could be deposited to the ground surface at night. Our results highlight the ever-changing contributions of aerosol and ground surfaces in nocturnal HONO production at different pollution levels and encourage more vertical gradient observations to evaluate the contributions from varied HONO sources.