Remote Sensing (Jan 2020)

Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations

  • Rajesh Janardanan,
  • Shamil Maksyutov,
  • Aki Tsuruta,
  • Fenjuan Wang,
  • Yogesh K. Tiwari,
  • Vinu Valsala,
  • Akihiko Ito,
  • Yukio Yoshida,
  • Johannes W. Kaiser,
  • Greet Janssens-Maenhout,
  • Mikhail Arshinov,
  • Motoki Sasakawa,
  • Yasunori Tohjima,
  • Douglas E. J. Worthy,
  • Edward J. Dlugokencky,
  • Michel Ramonet,
  • Jgor Arduini,
  • Jost V. Lavric,
  • Salvatore Piacentino,
  • Paul B. Krummel,
  • Ray L. Langenfelds,
  • Ivan Mammarella,
  • Tsuneo Matsunaga

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030375
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3
p. 375

Abstract

Read online

We employed a global high-resolution inverse model to optimize the CH4 emission using Greenhouse gas Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and surface observation data for a period from 2011−2017 for the two main source categories of anthropogenic and natural emissions. We used the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v4.3.2) for anthropogenic methane emission and scaled them by country to match the national inventories reported to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Wetland and soil sink prior fluxes were simulated using the Vegetation Integrative Simulator of Trace gases (VISIT) model. Biomass burning prior fluxes were provided by the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS). We estimated a global total anthropogenic and natural methane emissions of 340.9 Tg CH4 yr−1 and 232.5 Tg CH4 yr−1, respectively. Country-scale analysis of the estimated anthropogenic emissions showed that all the top-emitting countries showed differences with their respective inventories to be within the uncertainty range of the inventories, confirming that the posterior anthropogenic emissions did not deviate from nationally reported values. Large countries, such as China, Russia, and the United States, had the mean estimated emission of 45.7 ± 8.6, 31.9 ± 7.8, and 29.8 ± 7.8 Tg CH4 yr−1, respectively. For natural wetland emissions, we estimated large emissions for Brazil (39.8 ± 12.4 Tg CH4 yr−1), the United States (25.9 ± 8.3 Tg CH4 yr−1), Russia (13.2 ± 9.3 Tg CH4 yr−1), India (12.3 ± 6.4 Tg CH4 yr−1), and Canada (12.2 ± 5.1 Tg CH4 yr−1). In both emission categories, the major emitting countries all had the model corrections to emissions within the uncertainty range of inventories. The advantages of the approach used in this study were: (1) use of high-resolution transport, useful for simulations near emission hotspots, (2) prior anthropogenic emissions adjusted to the UNFCCC reports, (3) combining surface and satellite observations, which improves the estimation of both natural and anthropogenic methane emissions over spatial scale of countries.

Keywords