Cancer Medicine (Mar 2020)

Patient‐reported symptom burden as a prognostic factor in treatment with first‐line cetuximab plus chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of Phase II QUACK trial

  • Akira Ooki,
  • Satoshi Morita,
  • Shigeyoshi Iwamoto,
  • Hiroki Hara,
  • Hiroaki Tanioka,
  • Hironaga Satake,
  • Masato Kataoka,
  • Masahito Kotaka,
  • Yoshinori Kagawa,
  • Masato Nakamura,
  • Tatsushi Shingai,
  • Masashi Ishikawa,
  • Yasuhiro Miyake,
  • Takeshi Suto,
  • Yojiro Hashiguchi,
  • Taichi Yabuno,
  • Junichi Sakamoto,
  • Akihito Tsuji,
  • Masahiko Ando,
  • Kensei Yamaguchi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2826
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 5
pp. 1779 – 1789

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background It remains unclear whether patients’ self‐perceptions of symptoms at baseline clinically impact the prognostic relevance, treatment efficacy, or toxicity profiles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with the first‐line cetuximab and standard chemotherapy. Methods The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed the relationships between quality of life (QOL), treatment efficacy, and adverse events (AEs). Results The analysis of 137 mCRC patients revealed a significant association between the presence of baseline tumor‐related symptoms and a lower overall survival (OS) compared to the absence of symptoms (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.37‐4.62; P = .003). The asymptomatic responders had favorable outcomes compared to the symptomatic nonresponders (2‐year OS rates: 83.6% and 35.9%, respectively), while the symptomatic responders had similar outcomes to the asymptomatic nonresponders. The median postprogression survival differed significantly: 10.2 months for the symptomatic patients and 15.9 months for the asymptomatic patients (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.25‐4.29, P = .008). The objective response rates and patient toxicity profiles were similar irrespective of the severity of baseline symptoms. Conclusion Baseline symptoms were associated with worse OS but not with impaired treatment efficacy or more frequent AEs in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy.

Keywords